Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/09/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] My last word on RF
From: Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2000 14:35:00 -0700
References: <F55F2geGhRA9kO3JLQf0000375f@hotmail.com> <v04210102b5e58c5c56c2@[216.93.35.52]> <39BFEB56.65CE4162@rabiner.cncoffice.com> <a0500190fb5e59fdc3347@[207.8.95.196]>

Robert Jagitsch wrote:
> 
> >
> >Let's not blur the differentiation between accessories and a lens;
> >Or a camera.
> >Hexars are not a treat.
> >It's just obnoxious hearing about them as if they are anywhere close
> >to being in
> >the same league as an M6. Those statements involve even more intense blurring.
> >Does the fact that the Hexar is so amazingly overpriced fool some people? If
> >they cost half what they cost I might even consider one.
> >
> 
> Did anyone say they were in the same league? Not that I'm aware of.
> They are just a viable alternative, and a tool.  And if the Hexar is
> overpriced, what does that make Leica gear, ultraoverpriced? LOL
> 
> -R

no they in effect said they were better.
Mark W. Rabiner
:)

Replies: Reply from Thomas Kachadurian <tom@kachadurian.com> (Re: [Leica] My last word on RF)
In reply to: Message from "Dances_with Leicas" <m6ttl72@hotmail.com> ([Leica] My last word on RF)
Message from Thomas Kachadurian <tom@kachadurian.com> (Re: [Leica] My last word on RF)
Message from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com> (Re: [Leica] My last word on RF)
Message from Robert Jagitsch <robertj@powerlogix.com> (Re: [Leica] My last word on RF)