Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/09/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re: m6 AND hexar rf
From: Robert Jagitsch <robertj@powerlogix.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2000 16:37:43 -0500
References: <009201c01c21$1f79d330$640210ac@siege.jcberger.com> <20000910164524.19629.qmail@larch.math.umn.edu> <39BBDFA3.C96924F7@rabiner.cncoffice.com> <39BC09D6.EE03EBBD@CameraQuest.com> <009201c01c21$1f79d330$640210ac@siege.jcberger.com> <4.1.20000912140310.02bbc2b0@xsj02.sjs.agilent.com>
 
>
>
>So my humble opinion is, there really isn't anything that a Hexar can do
>that is "better" than an M camera. It does "different" things, not
>necessarily better things. Some of these "different" things can actually be
>a burden.
>

Having used both, the Hexar beats an M with a RapidWinder hands down, 
because it's much smaller and lighter and faster; and I find the 
faster shutter speed helpful because I prefer to shoot wide open as 
much as possible. But this is a preference of mine, not necessarily a 
case of "better."


- -R
Replies: Reply from Jim Brick <jim_brick@agilent.com> ([Leica] Re: My last word on RF)
 In reply to: Message from Jim Brick <jim_brick@agilent.com> ([Leica] Re: m6 AND hexar rf)