Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/07/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Austin I agree on the lack of latitude. However, if the accurate rendition of skin tones is paramount then I find the 160NC to be very good indeed, in my SLR. You might want to try the Kodak Supra films also, if you haven't already. Better latitude and still excellent skin tones, even in the M6. You would be hard pressed to tell the difference between Supra 800 and other slower speed films from a normal viewing distance (loupes excepted). Simon Austin Franklin wrote > > No, I used the NC160 the past week, and it paled in comparison to the 100 I > shot. I will no more when I scan them later this week. The prints from > the NC160 did not have much latitude. > > Austin > > ---------- > From: Simon Lamb > Sent: Monday, July 17, 2000 7:13 PM > To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > Subject: Re: [Leica] Color neg studio film > > I was referring to Kodak Portra 160 NC as opposed to the VC. If that is > not > what you were referencing then my apologies. > > Simon > > Austin Franklin wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I was referring to NC160 isn't that Vericolor? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Austin > > > > ---------- > > From: CIS > > Sent: Monday, July 17, 2000 5:53 PM > > To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > > Subject: Re: [Leica] Color neg studio film > > > > I have not found the Kodak Portra 160 to be very good in my M6 but in my > > other SLR camera I have taken some exceptional images, especially the > skin > > tones and detail resolution. I was asked to photograph two christenings > as > > a result of the Portra images taken with the SLR. Perhaps the 'yuk' > factor > > is the film is not a good match with Leica gear. > > > > Simon > > > > Austin Franklin wrote > > > > > > > > I found in MF the 160 is superb, but I must agree, in 35, it's yuk. I > > really like the 100... > > > > > > > > > >