Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/07/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi, No, I used the NC160 the past week, and it paled in comparison to the 100 I shot. I will no more when I scan them later this week. The prints from the NC160 did not have much latitude. Austin - ---------- From: Simon Lamb Sent: Monday, July 17, 2000 7:13 PM To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Subject: Re: [Leica] Color neg studio film I was referring to Kodak Portra 160 NC as opposed to the VC. If that is not what you were referencing then my apologies. Simon Austin Franklin wrote: > Hi, > > I was referring to NC160 isn't that Vericolor? > > Thanks, > > Austin > > ---------- > From: CIS > Sent: Monday, July 17, 2000 5:53 PM > To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > Subject: Re: [Leica] Color neg studio film > > I have not found the Kodak Portra 160 to be very good in my M6 but in my > other SLR camera I have taken some exceptional images, especially the skin > tones and detail resolution. I was asked to photograph two christenings as > a result of the Portra images taken with the SLR. Perhaps the 'yuk' factor > is the film is not a good match with Leica gear. > > Simon > > Austin Franklin wrote > > > > > I found in MF the 160 is superb, but I must agree, in 35, it's yuk. I > really like the 100... > > > >