Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/07/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Rick I rated the 160 at 160 and a roll at 125 to get a little more exposure and did not get the results that I expected when compared to the F5 images. Not sure what it is but may be the corollary of Kodachrome and M6 being an ideal partnership, Portra and M6 not so. Not very scientific but just my experiences. Simon Rick Dykstra wrote: > > Hi folks, > > I just got my first roll of Portra 400VC back from a good lab. The > prints look good, but the negs look a little underexposed. I rated the > film at 400 in an M6TTL, one with a known and accurate meter. Do any > experienced users have thoughts on how to rate this film? > > Regards > > Rick Dykstra >