Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/07/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]CIS wrote: > > I have not found the Kodak Portra 160 to be very good in my M6 but in my > other SLR camera I have taken some exceptional images, especially the skin > tones and detail resolution. I was asked to photograph two christenings as > a result of the Portra images taken with the SLR. Perhaps the 'yuk' factor > is the film is not a good match with Leica gear. > > Simon > > Austin Franklin wrote > > > > > I found in MF the 160 is superb, but I must agree, in 35, it's yuk. I > really like the 100... > > Hi folks, I just got my first roll of Portra 400VC back from a good lab. The prints look good, but the negs look a little underexposed. I rated the film at 400 in an M6TTL, one with a known and accurate meter. Do any experienced users have thoughts on how to rate this film? Regards Rick Dykstra