Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2000/06/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] Positive vs. Negative
From: Jeff S <4season@boulder.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2000 09:31:46 -0600
References: <200006122106.OAA19032@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> <017001bfd4bc$11446b60$a882e0d8@i928653> <001b01bfd4d4$71e12900$953d18d1@PACBELL.NET> <023001bfd4dd$616c1f40$a882e0d8@i928653> <024501bfd4df$19d13600$a882e0d8@i928653>
Joe Codispoti wrote:
>
> Sorry all, this has nothing to do with personalities.
>
> I have been wondering lately why some photographers, Jim included, expose
> chromes instead of negative film when (publishing aside) the final result is
> a print.
>
Much easier to sort through and discard obvious duds--they even cut the
film into individual frames for you! Easy to view, easy to evaluate, not
so easy to print, so maybe find someone to do that for you.
Jeff Segawa
no archive
Replies:
Reply from Jim Brick <jimbrick@photoaccess.com> ([Leica] Re: Positive vs. Negative)
Reply from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com> (Re: [Leica] Positive vs. Negative)
In reply to:
Message from "Joe Codispoti" <joecodi@thegrid.net> (Re: [Leica] it DOESN'T work well for leica!)
Message from "Tom Schofield" <tdschofield@email.msn.com> (Re: [Leica] it DOESN'T work well for leica!)
Message from "Joe Codispoti" <joecodi@thegrid.net> (Re: [Leica] it DOESN'T work well for leica!)
Message from "Joe Codispoti" <joecodi@thegrid.net> ([Leica] Positive vs. Negative)