Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/06/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] it DOESN'T work well for leica!
From: Jeff S <4season@boulder.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2000 19:40:29 -0600
References: <200006121550.LAA29910@unix3.netaxs.com>

If I bought a Holga and found specks in the lens, should it go to Sherry
Krauter for a checkup? ;-)

No time to work on mastering black and white photography AND keep a
website constantly updated! Hence my own website is sorely neglected so
I can't really show you what I've been doing with *my* Leicas--for that,
you'll have to partake of a Denver LUG get-together. Me, I haven't
wanted to spend much time on any web stuff. And the money I could've
spent on a Umax Powerlook III and Nikon LS2000 scanner and Silverfast
software I spent instead on lenses, chemicals and paper.

Jeff Segawa

no archive


Kyle Cassidy wrote:
> 
> >from; http://www.toycamera.com/index.html
> >Toy Camera Credo:
> >To illuminate and rejuvenate, to inspire great visions of truth and
> 
> [snip]
> 
> aside from the "shoot from the heart, not the pocketbook" there are other
> vast differences between the www.toycamera.com group and the leica uses
> group, THEY KICK OUR ASSES every time. i'm absolutely serious, go ahead
> and compare their site to ours. we should all be throwing our cameras in
> the river and hiding our heads in shame. THESE are the 17 year olds with
> half a clue who live down the block and take their $12 junkstore cameras
> out and shoot their butts off every day.
[snip]

In reply to: Message from Kyle Cassidy <cassidy@netaxs.com> ([Leica] it DOESN'T work well for leica!)