Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/03/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] RE: Re: Re: velvia and Taj Mahal
From: "Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter)" <peterk@lucent.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 1999 09:50:26 -0800

I did not imply you as in specificall you, I guess it should read, if one
rates it at 80....

E-mail is a pain since there are no voice inflections to realize terms.  But
alas, English with 3x the words of most other languages is easy, once you
get past words like Ka-Nife....

- -----Original Message-----
From: Jim Brick [mailto:jimbrick@photoaccess.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 1999 9:35 AM
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: [Leica] RE: Re: Re: velvia and Taj Mahal


At 09:20 AM 3/3/99 -0800, you wrote:
>Jim,
>
>Kodachrome is a true 64, if you rate it at 80 you just make it more
>contrasty.
>

Peter,

I've never rated K64 at anything but 64. Where did you get the idea that I
rated it at 80?

I simply stated that Kodachrome thrives on slight underexposure. I said
this because this has been its reputation. I didn't say that I did this. I
don't.

Jim