Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/03/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] RE: Re: Re: velvia and Taj Mahal
From: Jim Brick <jimbrick@photoaccess.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Mar 1999 09:34:34 -0800
 
At 09:20 AM 3/3/99 -0800, you wrote:
>Jim,
>
>Kodachrome is a true 64, if you rate it at 80 you just make it more
>contrasty.
>

Peter,

I've never rated K64 at anything but 64. Where did you get the idea that I
rated it at 80?

I simply stated that Kodachrome thrives on slight underexposure. I said
this because this has been its reputation. I didn't say that I did this. I
don't.

Jim