Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/09/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I have been heavily abusing my R4 for 13 years. I seldom put it in camer= a bag and just let it swings around by shoulders, banging around. Up to date, only have it serviced once for the foam replacement. (Very m= inor, the hardening of foam is a natural aging problem. Got it replaced for le= ss than $10) Expecting to it to be in service for many many more years. If this is no= t reliable, I don't know what it! (For other brand camera with similar age,= they might have been recycled and became a trash can or bicycle already. : )) BTW, R4 resale value is low. Is it because collectors are not interested= in old electronic cameras? Should be. : ) Regards, Ben > There are strong and serious rumors about the reliability of the R4. Th= e > price is low because that camera is crappy. I had one some years ago. I > bought it =A3 350 and Leica France estimated the repair at =A3 300 with= out the > CLA !I prefer not to say how I got rid of it. > Today, even Leica France informs potential buyers of the high cost of = a > repair. > Forget it !And look at a R7, the first reliable Leica reflex.