Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/02/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Advice on 35m for SL
From: Marco Grande <hektor73@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 1998 09:23:38 -0800 (PST)

Eric-

What is your experience with R 35mm lenses?

MG



- ---Eric Welch <ewelch@ponyexpress.net> wrote:
>
> At 04:45 PM 2/26/98 -0800, you wrote:
> 
> >Thanks for the response. Havent heard from other LUGers, maybe 35 is
> >less popular in R than M.
> 
> Not so. The 35s are very good lenses.
> 
> >I dont think the Summilux is an option on the SL, do you know if that
> >is correct?
> 
> That is correct. You need an SL2 or later, I think. The SL2 swings the
> mirror back a bit before rising. The SL doesn't.
> ==========
> 
> Eric Welch
> St. Joseph, MO
> http://www.ponyexpress.net/~ewelch
> 
> We can never be born enough. We are human beings; for whom birth is a
> supremely welcome mystery that happens only and whenever we are
faithful to
> ourselves.
> 
> - e. e. cummings
> 

_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com