Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/01/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] 90mm M 2.8 question. Should I buy?
From: CapsTeeth <CapsTeeth@aol.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 1998 17:10:13 EST

In a message dated 98-01-14 15:58:11 EST, you write:

> Hello all.
>  
>  Yesterday I met someone who wanted to downsize his equipment and was
>  selling a few Leica pieces.  He had what appeared to be an almost Mint on
>  the outside 90mm Elmarit 2.8 M lens which I was interested in.  I then
>  looked at the glass.  There were no external scratches on either side but I
>  saw 2 tiny lens separation marks.  He told me that he brought it to someone
>  that said that I would never notice these marks in my pictures at all and
>  it's a sharp lens.  I always worry about buying things like that.  Can
>  anyone help me out?  The price was amazing though...I think...$300.00 with
>  caps.   Let me know any thoughts.
>  
>  Gabe
                         You don't specify if this is a latest-version Elmarit
(E46 filter, pull-out lenshood) or the early one from 1959-74, or perhaps even
a 90 Tele-Elmarit.  If it's either of the earlier versions I'd personally take
a pass because the price isn't all that much less than an optically-perfect
copy can be had for.  If it's the latest 90 2.8, I'd buy it with a 14-day MBG
and take it or send it 2nd-day air to a qualified Leica technician for an
expert opinion.  Or, you could shoot a test roll and scrutinize it under an 8x
loupe...but even if the slides look fine, if elements have a separation
happening you must be certain it's not going to get worse and for that I'd
still want an expert to look at it.  Of course $300 is a good price for a new-
version 90 that shoots perfectly...but very expensive for a paperweight!