Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/07/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Pascal wrote: <<Anyone having experience with the Summilux-R 80 mm f/1.4 lens?>>>> Hi Pascal, I have had one since they came on the market and have used it at all apertures and it works just fine from wide open to smallest. It is absolutely fantastic wide open and I've shot lots of Kodachrome 64 wide open where others fear to tread. :) It creates a wonderful out of focus ethereal effect of the background that separates the main subject like nothing you've ever seen. If you are going to purchase this lens, as it is very expensive surely you would buy it to use wide open or closed down only a couple of stops for most of it's use. I believe I've said before, I have always purchased lenses for the speed of the lens first and what it'll do after that second, due to the way I shoot 99.9% of my work by available light. I've used the 80mm 1.4 in steel mills, operating rooms, mines and factories and high roller restaurants and it has never failed to give pictures by available light that make me look good. :) <<<They said that quality of this lens would be deteriorating if used at normal (smaller) apertures.>>>>> When I hear things like this from "Leica people" or others it usually means one of the folks referring to the test bench where you might see something, but they have never taken the lens out and shot pictures with it where in actual fact the human eye probably wouldn't detect any deteriorating effect from aperture to another unless you were using an incredibly powerful magnifier like on a test bench. My bottom line comment: If you are going to use it for wide aperture available light shooting there isn't much better. If you are not going to do the majority of the shooting in this fashion, why spend the money and buy something else. :) ted