[Leica] SL Review

[Tina Manley]

Auto-focus for me.

Tina

On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 9:52 PM, Richard Man <richard at richardmanphoto.com>
wrote:

> Not that I am Leica :-), but what are your criteria for a better-than-M240
> M?
>
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 6:03 PM, Robert Adler <rgacpa at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Agree. And I'm hoping they will come out with a new M that will meet some
> > needs of mine currently not met...
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 5:46 PM, Richard Man <richard at imagecraft.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Leica does not claim the SL as the M solution. Only that it can take M
> > > lens. For product sales, it makes a lot of sense to keep the lines
> > separate
> > >
> > > On Wednesday, November 18, 2015, Robert Adler <rgacpa at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I decided to plop down the ~$35 for the Reid Reviews. I wanted to
> know
> > > how
> > > > my 35/2 performed on the SL. He tests that lens specifically as well
> > as a
> > > > few other wides.
> > > > As he asks not to "distribute that information", I can only say that,
> > as
> > > a
> > > > landscape photographer and one who also shoots below f/5.6 in other
> > > > situations, I am not the least bit interested in the SL anymore...
> > > > Best,
> > > > Bob
> >
> --
> // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>
> // http://facebook.com/richardmanphoto
> // https://instagram.com/richardmanphoto
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



-- 
Tina Manley
http://
<http://t.sidekickopen28.com/e1t/c/5/f18dQhb0S7lC8dDMPbW2n0x6l2B9nMJN7t5XYgfmKYPW4WzBHl3Mx_9dW3LqWkM56dQ1Jf7P8b5b02?t=http%3A%2F%2Ftina-manley.artistwebsites.com%2F&si=6038418186567680&pi=3f8ad767-65c9-4969-afcb-309a4d4e20c2>
www.tinamanley.com
http://tina-manley.artistwebsites.com/