[Leica] SL Review

[Douglas Barry]

Nathan,
Yes, but, perhaps, even they are possibly conscious of the legacy of the 
camera they've bought, and don't really want to damage its resale value for 
future off loading by badmouthing it.

Douglas

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Nathan Wajsman" <photo at frozenlight.eu>
To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2015 7:44 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] SL Review


> But equally important is to weed out the corporate shills. Anybody who has 
> a prototype from Leica is an insider in my view, and I certainly take such 
> a person’s reviews with a big grain of salt. The most trustworthy reviews 
> are by people who buy the equipment like you and I would have to do and 
> have no connection with or privileged access to the manufacturer, e.g. 
> Consumer Reports.
>
> Cheers,
> Nathan
>
> Nathan Wajsman
> Alicante, Spain
> http://www.frozenlight.eu <http://www.frozenlight.eu/>
> http:// <http://www.greatpix.eu/>www.greatpix.eu
> PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws 
> <http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws>Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/ 
> <http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/>
> Cycling: http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator 
> <http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator>
> YNWA
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>> On 18 Nov 2015, at 17:16, Tina Manley <images at comporium.net> wrote:
>>
>> There are lots of reviews if you just Google Leica SL reviews, but you do
>> have to ignore the Leica-haters and there are a lot of them out there!
>>
>> Tina
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information