[Leica] SL Review

[Steve Barbour]

I agree with Nathan and the reason for this is readily apparent, if not obvious.

Sent from my iPhone

> On Nov 18, 2015, at 11:44 AM, Nathan Wajsman <photo at frozenlight.eu> wrote:
> 
> But equally important is to weed out the corporate shills. Anybody who has a prototype from Leica is an insider in my view, and I certainly take such a person’s reviews with a big grain of salt. The most trustworthy reviews are by people who buy the equipment like you and I would have to do and have no connection with or privileged access to the manufacturer, e.g. Consumer Reports.
> 
> Cheers,
> Nathan
> 
> Nathan Wajsman
> Alicante, Spain
> http://www.frozenlight.eu <http://www.frozenlight.eu/>
> http:// <http://www.greatpix.eu/>www.greatpix.eu
> PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws <http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws>Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/ <http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/>
> Cycling: http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator <http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator>
> YNWA
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> On 18 Nov 2015, at 17:16, Tina Manley <images at comporium.net> wrote:
>> 
>> There are lots of reviews if you just Google Leica SL reviews, but you do
>> have to ignore the Leica-haters and there are a lot of them out there!
>> 
>> Tina
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information