[Leica] Q vs M for size
John McMaster
john at mcmaster.co.nz
Sun Jun 14 00:53:55 PDT 2015
It is cheaper if a 28mm only suits you, has AF and possibly sharper.... Plus
a sealed sensor so no dust?
john
-----Original Message-----
From: Nathan Wajsman
But if it is as big as an M, then what is the point of it? Might as well get
an M then, with the flexibility that entails.
Cheers,
Nathan
Nathan Wajsman
> On 14 Jun 2015, at 05:29, Dante Stella <dstella1 at ameritech.net> wrote:
>
> I got to play with one yesterday. It is indeed M-sized, as in M6 with a
fat 50. It may beck game changer.
>
> Dante
>
>> On Jun 13, 2015, at 8:26 PM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.co.nz> wrote:
>>
>> I think my M with 28mm Summicron might be smaller......
>>
>> http://www.wired.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Leica-Q_top1-1024x768
>> .jpg
>>
>> john
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jay Burleson
>>
>> It can be, by a little bit, but then you get into the small body /
>> huge lens mismatch.
>>
>> http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/71E4shHGbjL._SL1500_.jpg
>>
>> Jay
>>
>>> On 6/13/2015 8:10 PM, John McMaster wrote:
>>> First image I have seen with both...
>>>
>>> http://leicarumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/DSC0377.jpg
>>>
>>> I thought EVF was meant to be more compact than a rangefinder ;-)
>>>
>>> john
>>
>>
More information about the LUG
mailing list