[Leica] Q vs M for size

[Philippe]

Touch screen - so cool!
No kidding
Ph

Le 14 juin 2015 à 09:53, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.co.nz> a écrit :

> It is cheaper if a 28mm only suits you, has AF and possibly sharper.... Plus
> a sealed sensor so no dust?
> 
> john
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nathan Wajsman
> 
> But if it is as big as an M, then what is the point of it? Might as well get
> an M then, with the flexibility that entails.
> 
> Cheers,
> Nathan
> 
> Nathan Wajsman
> 
> 
>> On 14 Jun 2015, at 05:29, Dante Stella <dstella1 at ameritech.net> wrote:
>> 
>> I got to play with one yesterday. It is indeed M-sized, as in M6 with a
> fat 50. It may beck game changer.
>> 
>> Dante
>> 
>>> On Jun 13, 2015, at 8:26 PM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.co.nz> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I think my M with 28mm Summicron might be smaller......
>>> 
>>> http://www.wired.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Leica-Q_top1-1024x768
>>> .jpg
>>> 
>>> john
>>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Jay Burleson
>>> 
>>> It can be, by a little bit, but then you get into the small body / 
>>> huge lens mismatch.
>>> 
>>> http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/71E4shHGbjL._SL1500_.jpg
>>> 
>>> Jay
>>> 
>>>> On 6/13/2015 8:10 PM, John McMaster wrote:
>>>> First image I have seen with both...
>>>> 
>>>> http://leicarumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/DSC0377.jpg
>>>> 
>>>> I thought EVF was meant to be more compact than a rangefinder ;-)
>>>> 
>>>> john
>>> 
>>> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information