[Leica] Q vs M for size

[Nathan Wajsman]

But if it is as big as an M, then what is the point of it? Might as well get an M then, with the flexibility that entails.

Cheers,
Nathan

Nathan Wajsman

Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu
http://www.greatpix.eu
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/

Cycling: http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator

YNWA













> On 14 Jun 2015, at 05:29, Dante Stella <dstella1 at ameritech.net> wrote:
> 
> I got to play with one yesterday. It is indeed M-sized, as in M6 with a fat 50. It may beck game changer.
> 
> Dante
> 
>> On Jun 13, 2015, at 8:26 PM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.co.nz> wrote:
>> 
>> I think my M with 28mm Summicron might be smaller......
>> 
>> http://www.wired.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Leica-Q_top1-1024x768.jpg
>> 
>> john
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jay Burleson
>> 
>> It can be, by a little bit, but then you get into the small body / huge lens
>> mismatch.
>> 
>> http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/71E4shHGbjL._SL1500_.jpg
>> 
>> Jay
>> 
>>> On 6/13/2015 8:10 PM, John McMaster wrote:
>>> First image I have seen with both...
>>> 
>>> http://leicarumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/DSC0377.jpg
>>> 
>>> I thought EVF was meant to be more compact than a rangefinder ;-)
>>> 
>>> john
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>