[Leica] Q vs. M for size

[Mark Rabiner]

I'd love a new M or Q but need more Moneypenny.


On 6/13/15 11:29 PM, "Dante Stella" <dstella1 at ameritech.net> wrote:

> I got to play with one yesterday. It is indeed M-sized, as in M6 with a fat
> 50. It may beck game changer.
> 
> Dante
> 
>> On Jun 13, 2015, at 8:26 PM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.co.nz> wrote:
>> 
>> I think my M with 28mm Summicron might be smaller......
>> 
>> http://www.wired.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Leica-Q_top1-1024x768.jpg
>> 
>> john
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jay Burleson
>> 
>> It can be, by a little bit, but then you get into the small body / huge lens
>> mismatch.
>> 
>> http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/71E4shHGbjL._SL1500_.jpg
>> 
>> Jay
>> 
>>> On 6/13/2015 8:10 PM, John McMaster wrote:
>>> First image I have seen with both...
>>> 
>>> http://leicarumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/DSC0377.jpg
>>> 
>>> I thought EVF was meant to be more compact than a rangefinder ;-)
>>> 
>>> john
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information




-- 
Mark William Rabiner
Photographer
http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/