[Leica] Which has more central Resolution: Sony 28-70 or Leica 28-70?

[Nathan Wajsman]

No need to get emotional about it, Frank. Nobody attacked you ad hominem, this is a legitimate exchange of views. Nowhere in my message did I say that your methods are worthless, I just said what I do. As far as I can see, nobody else said anything like that either.

Cheers,
Nathan

Nathan Wajsman
Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu <http://www.frozenlight.eu/>
http:// <http://www.greatpix.eu/>www.greatpix.eu
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws <http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws>Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/ <http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/>
Cycling: http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator <http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator>
YNWA













> On 06 Dec 2015, at 16:39, Frank Filippone <red735i at verizon.net> wrote:
> 
> Wonderful,  and my methods, which are more scientific, which is how I was trained, are therefore false?  Worthless? Of no value to the general community? Or time wasting?
> 
> Why?  In what way?   
> 
> Why was there even response like this?  Did someone see it as a public challenge to their methodologies?
> 
> Isn't their room for BOTH ( or more) approaches, without negative connotations ( or responses) to either?
> 
> It is time to use the delete button if you are not interested in reading something..... about technical, artistic, and every other kind of issue.....
> 
> Just because you own a keyboard, is no reason to be impolite or intolerant or argumentative...... or just plain negative.
> 
> Use the delete key.  More often, apparently.
> 
> Frank Filippone
> Red735i at verizon.net
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information