[Leica] Leica heresy

[Mark Rabiner]

Was not referring to you Richard but the guy with the website who did the
writing on the thing.


On 11/3/14 7:18 PM, "Richard S. Taylor" <r.s.taylor at comcast.net> wrote:

> Jeeze, Mark, take a deep breath will you and re-read my note.  It was a
> ancient 12MP D300 that went not a D800.  As I get older I don’t what to lug
> all that weight around so I didn’t wasn’t to upgrade my Nikon stuff.
> 
> 16MP is enough for what I want to do regardless of sensor size so I’m mostly
> shooting with an Oly EM-1 these days and pulled my old micro 4/3rds lenses out
> of the closet to use on it.  Two of them are PanaLeicas’s.  Great stuff.
> 
> … though I must say a yearning for one of the Sony A7’s persists and one may
> end up in my hands one of these days.
> 
> You have your needs, I have mine.  Mustn’t confuse the two.  If you need a
> large sensor hi-res camera, use it.  I don’t.
> 
> Best, 
> 
> Dick
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Nov 03, 2014, at 5:08 PM, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> wrote:
> 
>> Funny but this is a guy who in effect traded his D800 Nikon for a Fuji
>> X100s. So its clear he's missing a few links in his grasp of camera
>> function. Great with typing out  caricatures of people based on this non
>> grasp of the basics of what certain cameras are all about and what certain
>> other aren't.
>> 
>> Why do I need a Nikon D800 full frame 36mp camera when I can just shoot with
>> a 16 Mp APS-C cropped Fuji pseudo rangefinder listing for $999?
>> Because there is little overlap in what these camera are all about.  If  you
>> bought and used to of the rez Nikon why would you even look at the Fuji?
>> The 800 now 810 is the king of full frame cameras when you need the highest
>> resolution and tonal range possible.
>> The fuji is when quality is not so much the issue as you are shooting a
>> cropped camera which is all about compactness and low price point and trying
>> to pass itself off as a bargain basement Leica.
>> 
>> 
>> On 11/1/14 10:23 AM, "Richard S. Taylor" <r.s.taylor at comcast.net> wrote:
>> 
>>> Amen!  Very funny, very on the mark.  ButŠ  I just sold my X Pro-1 and all
>>> it¹s lenses because all the new lenses Fuji has announced will be physically
>>> large.* More and more, I find, I want to carry less and less when I
>>> photograph.  I kept my X100s, thoughŠ
>>> 
>>> Best, 
>>> 
>>> Dick
>>> 
>>> *My D300 and it¹s two big zooms went months ago, too.
>>> 
>>> On Oct 31, 2014, at 11:23 PM, Jay Burleson <leica at jayburleson.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> He got it in one...
>>>> 
>>>> Jay (who has a X100T pre-ordered.)
>>>> 
>>>> On 10/31/2014 5:54 PM, Robert Adler wrote:
>>>>> A camera walks into a bar:
>>>>> 
http://www.tomen.de/fuji-x100s-review-a-camera-walks-into-a-bar-zack-arias>>>>>
/
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Mark William Rabiner
>> Photographer
>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information




-- 
Mark William Rabiner
Photographer
http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/