[Leica] Leica heresy

[Richard Taylor]

Mark - Ah, it makes sense now.  Thanks.  

Dick




On Nov 03, 2014, at 7:44 PM, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> wrote:

> Was not referring to you Richard but the guy with the website who did the
> writing on the thing.
> 
> 
> On 11/3/14 7:18 PM, "Richard S. Taylor" <r.s.taylor at comcast.net> wrote:
> 
>> Jeeze, Mark, take a deep breath will you and re-read my note.  It was a
>> ancient 12MP D300 that went not a D800.  As I get older I don’t what to lug
>> all that weight around so I didn’t wasn’t to upgrade my Nikon stuff.
>> 
>> 16MP is enough for what I want to do regardless of sensor size so I’m mostly
>> shooting with an Oly EM-1 these days and pulled my old micro 4/3rds lenses out
>> of the closet to use on it.  Two of them are PanaLeicas’s.  Great stuff.
>> 
>> … though I must say a yearning for one of the Sony A7’s persists and one may
>> end up in my hands one of these days.
>> 
>> You have your needs, I have mine.  Mustn’t confuse the two.  If you need a
>> large sensor hi-res camera, use it.  I don’t.
>> 
>> Best, 
>> 
>> Dick
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Nov 03, 2014, at 5:08 PM, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Funny but this is a guy who in effect traded his D800 Nikon for a Fuji
>>> X100s. So its clear he's missing a few links in his grasp of camera
>>> function. Great with typing out  caricatures of people based on this non
>>> grasp of the basics of what certain cameras are all about and what certain
>>> other aren't.
>>> 
>>> Why do I need a Nikon D800 full frame 36mp camera when I can just shoot with
>>> a 16 Mp APS-C cropped Fuji pseudo rangefinder listing for $999?
>>> Because there is little overlap in what these camera are all about.  If  you
>>> bought and used to of the rez Nikon why would you even look at the Fuji?
>>> The 800 now 810 is the king of full frame cameras when you need the highest
>>> resolution and tonal range possible.
>>> The fuji is when quality is not so much the issue as you are shooting a
>>> cropped camera which is all about compactness and low price point and trying
>>> to pass itself off as a bargain basement Leica.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 11/1/14 10:23 AM, "Richard S. Taylor" <r.s.taylor at comcast.net> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Amen!  Very funny, very on the mark.  ButŠ  I just sold my X Pro-1 and all
>>>> it¹s lenses because all the new lenses Fuji has announced will be physically
>>>> large.* More and more, I find, I want to carry less and less when I
>>>> photograph.  I kept my X100s, thoughŠ
>>>> 
>>>> Best, 
>>>> 
>>>> Dick
>>>> 
>>>> *My D300 and it¹s two big zooms went months ago, too.
>>>> 
>>>> On Oct 31, 2014, at 11:23 PM, Jay Burleson <leica at jayburleson.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> He got it in one...
>>>>> 
>>>>> Jay (who has a X100T pre-ordered.)
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 10/31/2014 5:54 PM, Robert Adler wrote:
>>>>>> A camera walks into a bar:
>>>>>> 
> http://www.tomen.de/fuji-x100s-review-a-camera-walks-into-a-bar-zack-arias>>>>>
> /
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Mark William Rabiner
>>> Photographer
>>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Mark William Rabiner
> Photographer
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information