Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/01/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Your comment is going to attract undue attention. I am really tired of hearing how Digital is better/worse/same as Film. MF film is as good/better, worse than 35mm Film/Digital. It is a moot point. Small format Digital won. No matter how you measure the sensor size...... And no,. I don't like it..... I am just being realistic. Frank Filippone Red735i at verizon.net Sorry, I meant FF digital Leica rather than film john > -----Original Message----- > > I was thinking the same. As good as Leica's lens are, there's no way > that a properly adjusted Hassy cannot compete. It's 4 times the > negative size area and Zeiss glass is no slouch by any measure. > > > On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Frank Filippone <red735i at verizon.net> > wrote: > > > You should have had the body checked out..... If all 3 of the > > lenses on a single body are out of focus, then suspect the body > > first. ( I thin I had mine adjusted for this.... they called it > > something like body length.....) > > > > If one lens is out, the others in, then it probably is the lens..... > > > > The lenses on a Hasselblad are scary sharp... if everything is > > working right..... > > > > Frank Filippone > > Red735i at verizon.net > > > > When I scanned in my Hasselblad negs (FP4) taken on SWC/M, 50, 80, > > 150 C T* lenses (my last kit was CF 903 SWC/M, 50, 100, 180) the > > Superwide ones were the only ones which were really sharp at > > 3200dpi. The others I am quite happy to be using the Leica's instead of. > > > > John > > > > _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information