Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/01/01

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] a "pro-hobbyist" evaluates an M9 . . . ICK
From: red735i at verizon.net (Frank Filippone)
Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2013 16:29:34 -0800
References: <CD0884E6.2CBB%mark@rabinergroup.com> <B87C31DB15084DD6B2D4BD1CE004A041@billHP> <80F9701439F20347874CE5E4E03C22E99EF7B7A5@WHIZZMAIL02.whizz.org>

You should have had the body checked out.....  If all 3 of the lenses on a
single body are out of focus, then suspect the body first.  ( I thin I had
mine adjusted for this.... they called it something like body length.....)

If one lens is out, the others in, then it probably is the lens.....

The lenses on a Hasselblad are scary sharp... if everything is working
right.....

Frank Filippone
Red735i at verizon.net

When I scanned in my Hasselblad negs (FP4) taken on SWC/M, 50, 80, 150 C T*
lenses (my last kit was CF 903 SWC/M, 50, 100, 180) the Superwide ones were
the only ones which were really sharp at 3200dpi. The others I am quite
happy to be using the Leica's instead of.

John



Replies: Reply from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] a "pro-hobbyist" evaluates an M9 . . . ICK)
Reply from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] a "pro-hobbyist" evaluates an M9 . . . ICK)
In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] a "pro-hobbyist" evaluates an M9 . . . ICK)
Message from billcpearce at cox.net (Bill Pearce) ([Leica] a "pro-hobbyist" evaluates an M9 . . . ICK)
Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] a "pro-hobbyist" evaluates an M9 . . . ICK)