Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/01/01

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] a "pro-hobbyist" evaluates an M9 . . . ICK
From: john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster)
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2013 00:36:42 +0000
References: <CD0884E6.2CBB%mark@rabinergroup.com> <B87C31DB15084DD6B2D4BD1CE004A041@billHP> <80F9701439F20347874CE5E4E03C22E99EF7B7A5@WHIZZMAIL02.whizz.org> <00aa01cde880$3da6c550$b8f44ff0$@verizon.net>

It was not out of focus, had been plenty sharp on 20x16 prints but 3200dpi 
scans are a different matter IME. The 500C/M had been back to Hasselblad UK 
for servicing.

john

> -----Original Message-----
> 
> You should have had the body checked out.....  If all 3 of the lenses on a
> single body are out of focus, then suspect the body first.  ( I thin I had 
> mine
> adjusted for this.... they called it something like body length.....)
> 
> If one lens is out, the others in, then it probably is the lens.....
> 
> The lenses on a Hasselblad are scary sharp... if everything is working 
> right.....
> 
> Frank Filippone
> Red735i at verizon.net
> 
> When I scanned in my Hasselblad negs (FP4) taken on SWC/M, 50, 80, 150 C
> T* lenses (my last kit was CF 903 SWC/M, 50, 100, 180) the Superwide ones
> were the only ones which were really sharp at 3200dpi. The others I am 
> quite
> happy to be using the Leica's instead of.
> 
> John
> 


Replies: Reply from red735i at verizon.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] a "pro-hobbyist" evaluates an M9 . . . ICK)
Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] a "pro-hobbyist" evaluates an M9 . . . ICK)
In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] a "pro-hobbyist" evaluates an M9 . . . ICK)
Message from billcpearce at cox.net (Bill Pearce) ([Leica] a "pro-hobbyist" evaluates an M9 . . . ICK)
Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] a "pro-hobbyist" evaluates an M9 . . . ICK)
Message from red735i at verizon.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] a "pro-hobbyist" evaluates an M9 . . . ICK)