Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/12/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Cameras Real Pros Use
From: images at comporium.net (Tina Manley)
Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2012 20:10:26 -0500
References: <20121202220306.BYCS29905.eastrmfepo203.cox.net@eastrmimpo306> <B84AFDA2C9F943F5944BDFDFAF7D8D42@billHP>

You are right, Bill.  I count my blessings every day and feel very
fortunate that I have been able to combine my loves of photography, travel,
families, and development in what I get paid to do.  I don't know of anyone
who loves their profession as much as I do.

Tina

On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 7:57 PM, Bill Pearce <billcpearce at cox.net> wrote:

> Leica is perfect for the kind of work that Tina does. Few are fortunate
> enough to be able to do that kind of work.
>
> -----Original Message----- From: jon.streeter
> Sent: Sunday, December 02, 2012 4:03 PM
> To: Leica Users Group
>
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Cameras Real Pros Use
>
> Tina's choice of Leica seems natural and insightful taking her marvelous
> body of work into account.  I can hardly imagine her, with the subjects I'm
> now familiar with, being there toting about a Whammoflex.
>
> Sent from my Verizon Wireless Phone
>
> ----- Reply message -----
> From: "Mark Rabiner" <mark at rabinergroup.com>
> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
> Subject: [Leica] Cameras Real Pros Use
> Date: Sun, Dec 2, 2012 12:46 pm
>
>
> Again while Phil's woes seem to be way off the bottom of the graph Tina's
> seem to be way off the top. Or visa versa. As a Leica optimist I'd love to
> believe Tina's and totally ignore Phil's but can't totally do neither.
>
> I think The new Digital M is going to work. And do a lot of fine work by a
> lot of dedicated people.
>
>
> Mark William Rabiner
> Photography
> http://gallery.leica-users.**org/v/lugalrabs/<http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/>
>
>
>  From: Geoff Hopkinson <hopsternew at gmail.com>
>> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>> Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2012 10:55:13 +1000
>> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>> Subject: Re: [Leica] Cameras Real Pros Use
>>
>> Am I still the only one astonished at Phil's report that all 10 M9 cameras
>> in his circle have all needed repair several times??
>> I cannot believe that is typical nor know of any other report of that
>> level
>> of failures (actually a 200 or 300% failure rate) to that effect anywhere
>> in my years of Leica involvement (nor about any other brand either for
>> that
>> matter).
>> I never suggested that the M9 is the best tool for professional
>> photojournalists. It has no video for a first consideration.
>> My comments were only on that reported failure rate.
>>
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See 
>> http://leica-users.org/**mailman/listinfo/lug<http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug>for
>>  more information
>>
>
>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See 
> http://leica-users.org/**mailman/listinfo/lug<http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug>for
>  more information
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See 
> http://leica-users.org/**mailman/listinfo/lug<http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug>for
>  more information
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See 
> http://leica-users.org/**mailman/listinfo/lug<http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug>for
>  more information
>
>


-- 
Tina Manley, ASMP
www.tinamanley.com


In reply to: Message from jon.streeter at cox.net (jon.streeter) ([Leica] Cameras Real Pros Use)
Message from billcpearce at cox.net (Bill Pearce) ([Leica] Cameras Real Pros Use)