[Leica] Cameras Real Pros Use

[jon.streeter at cox.net (jon.streeter)]

Tina's choice of Leica seems natural and insightful taking her marvelous 
body of work into account.  I can hardly imagine her, with the subjects I'm 
now familiar with, being there toting about a Whammoflex.  

Sent from my Verizon Wireless Phone

----- Reply message -----
From: "Mark Rabiner" <mark at rabinergroup.com>
To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
Subject: [Leica] Cameras Real Pros Use
Date: Sun, Dec 2, 2012 12:46 pm


Again while Phil's woes seem to be way off the bottom of the graph Tina's
seem to be way off the top. Or visa versa. As a Leica optimist I'd love to
believe Tina's and totally ignore Phil's but can't totally do neither.

I think The new Digital M is going to work. And do a lot of fine work by a
lot of dedicated people.


Mark William Rabiner
Photography
http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/


> From: Geoff Hopkinson <hopsternew at gmail.com>
> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2012 10:55:13 +1000
> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Cameras Real Pros Use
> 
> Am I still the only one astonished at Phil's report that all 10 M9 cameras
> in his circle have all needed repair several times??
> I cannot believe that is typical nor know of any other report of that level
> of failures (actually a 200 or 300% failure rate) to that effect anywhere
> in my years of Leica involvement (nor about any other brand either for that
> matter).
> I never suggested that the M9 is the best tool for professional
> photojournalists. It has no video for a first consideration.
> My comments were only on that reported failure rate.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information