Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/11/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Replacement equipment decisions after theft - insurance is doing right by me!
From: scoutfinch at chartermi.net (Sue Ryan)
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 22:00:58 -0500
References: <52FEDD8F-7C5B-4BF9-8376-DF7CB72F518E@chartermi.net> <BLU0-SMTP6415EECFD8E8703F732798C690@phx.gbl> <CA+yJO1BpzwMZ=beP1GQytAqTyqf8opRwRKH0N88x5k95F9y3Rw@mail.gmail.com> <80F9701439F20347874CE5E4E03C22E99C9D6DF2@WHIZZMAIL02.whizz.org>

Yes, but for the same money (within a few bucks here or there) I could have 
both the M9, AND the MM AND the 1.4.I'm wondering about the Nocti .95 and 
only having the M9 as opposed to  also having the MM with summilux in low 
light situations. I shoot with the intent to convert to BW 95% of the time. 
I loved my F1 nocti but sometimes it was kind of unrequited, given all its 
idiosyncracies.

Sue

Sent from my iPad

On Nov 7, 2012, at 9:34 PM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.co.nz> wrote:

> The f0.95 is quite different to the f1.0, depends on which look you 
> like..... I would expect an MM/50 Summilux to be of more general use with 
> an M9 and other lenses though?
> 
> john
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> 
> I agree totally.  But when you try out the Noctilux, you may be willing to 
> settle for that instead of cashing it in.  Just warning!  Good luck.
> 
> Tina
> 
> On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 9:17 PM, Vick Ko <vick.ko at sympatico.ca> wrote:
> 
>> Sue, for usage reasons, the 50/0.95 and 50/1.4 ASPH are apples and 
>> oranges different.
>> 
>> The 50/0.95 is a large (large) optic, with specialist properties.
>> 
>> The 50/1.4 ASPH is almost small and is an all purpose lens.  Sure, it 
>> only goes to f1.4, but it is not the huge piece of glass that the Nocti 
>> is.
>> 
>> But on the question of monetary value, isn't the 0.95 Nocti worth a 
>> lot more than the 50/1.4 ASPH?  I'd be tempted to get the Nocti, sell 
>> it and then buy the kit that you really want.
>> 
>> Vick
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 11/7/2012 9:03 PM, Sue Ryan wrote:
>> 
>>> In a recent theft I lost my 10 month old M9 and last model Nocti F1 
>>> that I had coded. My insurance will replace the M9 with a new M9 or 
>>> its cash value. They will replace my Nocti with a new, unused  Nocti 
>>> .95 at no out of pocket $ if I replace it through their supplier. For 
>>> the same replacement cost of the Nocti, I could come close to getting 
>>> the MM and a Summilux 50 ASPH 1.4. I already have an older 50 mm 'cron.
>>> 
>>> I need opinions - if you had the choice having an M9 and a .95 Nocti, 
>>> or an M9, MM and Summilux 50 ASPH, which would you choose? I'm not 
>>> interested in the new M for several reasons, so don't throw that 
>>> variable into the mix.
>>> 
>>> Thanks in advance,
>>> 
>>> Sue
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


Replies: Reply from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] Replacement equipment decisions after theft - insurance is doing right by me!)
Reply from benedenia at gmail.com (Marty Deveney) ([Leica] Replacement equipment decisions after theft - insurance is doing right by me!)
In reply to: Message from scoutfinch at chartermi.net (Sue Ryan) ([Leica] Replacement equipment decisions after theft - insurance is doing right by me!)
Message from vick.ko at sympatico.ca (Vick Ko) ([Leica] Replacement equipment decisions after theft - insurance is doing right by me!)
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Replacement equipment decisions after theft - insurance is doing right by me!)
Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] Replacement equipment decisions after theft - insurance is doing right by me!)