Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/11/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Sue, for usage reasons, the 50/0.95 and 50/1.4 ASPH are apples and oranges different. The 50/0.95 is a large (large) optic, with specialist properties. The 50/1.4 ASPH is almost small and is an all purpose lens. Sure, it only goes to f1.4, but it is not the huge piece of glass that the Nocti is. But on the question of monetary value, isn't the 0.95 Nocti worth a lot more than the 50/1.4 ASPH? I'd be tempted to get the Nocti, sell it and then buy the kit that you really want. Vick On 11/7/2012 9:03 PM, Sue Ryan wrote: > In a recent theft I lost my 10 month old M9 and last model Nocti F1 that I > had coded. My insurance will replace the M9 with a new M9 or its cash > value. They will replace my Nocti with a new, unused Nocti .95 at no out > of pocket $ if I replace it through their supplier. For the same > replacement cost of the Nocti, I could come close to getting the MM and a > Summilux 50 ASPH 1.4. I already have an older 50 mm 'cron. > > I need opinions - if you had the choice having an M9 and a .95 Nocti, or > an M9, MM and Summilux 50 ASPH, which would you choose? I'm not interested > in the new M for several reasons, so don't throw that variable into the > mix. > > Thanks in advance, > > Sue > > Sent from my iPad > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > >