Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/11/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Replacement equipment decisions after theft - insurance is doing right by me!
From: scoutfinch at chartermi.net (Sue Ryan)
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 21:09:09 -0500
References: <52FEDD8F-7C5B-4BF9-8376-DF7CB72F518E@chartermi.net>

I have to add that I live in the hinterlands of SE Michigan and don't have 
any opportunity to handle any Leica equipment before I buy, so I really 
value the LUG community's input.

Sue

Sent from my iPad

On Nov 7, 2012, at 9:03 PM, Sue Ryan <scoutfinch at chartermi.net> wrote:

> In a recent theft I lost my 10 month old M9 and last model Nocti F1 that I 
> had coded. My insurance will replace the M9 with a new M9 or its cash 
> value. They will replace my Nocti with a new, unused  Nocti .95 at no out 
> of pocket $ if I replace it through their supplier. For the same 
> replacement cost of the Nocti, I could come close to getting the MM and a 
> Summilux 50 ASPH 1.4. I already have an older 50 mm 'cron. 
> 
> I need opinions - if you had the choice having an M9 and a .95 Nocti, or 
> an M9, MM and Summilux 50 ASPH, which would you choose? I'm not interested 
> in the new M for several reasons, so don't throw that variable into the 
> mix.
> 
> Thanks in advance,
> 
> Sue
> 
> Sent from my iPad
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


In reply to: Message from scoutfinch at chartermi.net (Sue Ryan) ([Leica] Replacement equipment decisions after theft - insurance is doing right by me!)