Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/02/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I'd love to be proved wrong Nathan, particularly on this list :-( Amiti?s Philippe Le 7 f?vr. 12 ? 21:36, Nathan Wajsman a ?crit : > > OK, it is a big file, I grant you...but is it better than what an M9 > would produce? I don't think so. When I compare my M8 images with my > friend's full-frame Canon, the M8 is superior in every respect. It's > not all about size ;-)) > > Cheers, > Nathan > > Nathan Wajsman > Alicante, Spain > http://www.frozenlight.eu > http://www.greatpix.eu > http://www.nathanfoto.com > PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws > Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/ > > > YNWA > > > > On Feb 7, 2012, at 9:14 PM, philippe.amard wrote: > >> Nathan look at this one >> <http://chsv.nikon-image.com/products/camera/slr/digital/d800/img/sample01/img_07_l.jpg >> >> > >> >> Large ... >> >> Or where the future lies IMHO >> >> Amiti?s >> Philippe >> >> >> >> Le 7 f?vr. 12 ? 21:12, Nathan Wajsman a ?crit : >> >>> >>> OK, I'll bite; >>> >>> 1) Yawn. My Pentax K5 has it and I never use it. >>> 2) I find the buffer on my M8 adequate, so as long as it is not >>> worse, then I am fine. >>> 3) Double yawn. >>> 4) YES. I find the hybrid viewfinder on my Fuji X100 the most >>> significant photo technology innovation of the past several years. >>> The main reason I like it is that it allows for macro shooting >>> without parallax error. >>> 5) Not a big deal for me, I just have a couple of spares in my bag. >>> 6) The norm? Since when? 12 or 18 is more than enough. >>> 7) More yawn. >>> 8) YES! A usable ISO 6400 would be great. Surely Leica can do as >>> well as my Pentax K5?! >>> 9) Sure, why not. Will make the second-hand M9 I plan to buy once >>> the M10 is released and the "must-have-the-latest" crowd are >>> upgrading in volume, cheaper. >>> 10) No. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Nathan >>> >>> Nathan Wajsman >>> Alicante, Spain >>> http://www.frozenlight.eu >>> http://www.greatpix.eu >>> http://www.nathanfoto.com >>> PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws >>> Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/ >>> >>> >>> YNWA >>> >>> >>> >>> On Feb 7, 2012, at 7:36 PM, mehrdad wrote: >>> >>>> it seems that the new m digital is around the corner (sep/oct), >>>> what shall >>>> we expect after three years and 8k price? >>>> >>>> >>>> i for one do need the following >>>> >>>> >>>> 1) image stabilization built in to the body (they can licsnce this >>>> technology from sony, thier old partner) >>>> 2) much better buffer and more frames per second >>>> 3) shooting movies with m (not for me) >>>> 4) fuji x10/pro like view finder >>>> 5) better battery life and better battery >>>> 6) 36 meg is now the norm, so something close >>>> 7) a built in 1.4x magnifier, that u can use at will >>>> 8) all the given dynamic range and high iso performance (it is >>>> now three >>>> yrs later) >>>> 9) a better price but i think is is truly a dream >>>> 10) do we care about live view? >>>> -- >>>> ------------------------------------- >>>> regards, mehrdad >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Leica Users Group. >>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more >>>> information >>>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Leica Users Group. >>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information