Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/02/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] leica m10
From: philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard)
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 21:14:24 +0100
References: <CA+=0raD-LHEE+rZZG+UEOBCEV=Hk4e35PRgbu3qofrJqfyG9Gg@mail.gmail.com> <FD18A784-53ED-4A4C-803C-2D807F94A190@frozenlight.eu>

Nathan look at this one
<http://chsv.nikon-image.com/products/camera/slr/digital/d800/img/sample01/img_07_l.jpg
 
 >

Large ...

Or where the future lies IMHO

Amiti?s
Philippe



Le 7 f?vr. 12 ? 21:12, Nathan Wajsman a ?crit :

>
> OK, I'll bite;
>
> 1) Yawn. My Pentax K5 has it and I never use it.
> 2) I find the buffer on my M8 adequate, so as long as it is not  
> worse, then I am fine.
> 3) Double yawn.
> 4) YES. I find the hybrid viewfinder on my Fuji X100 the most  
> significant photo technology innovation of the past several years.  
> The main reason I like it is that it allows for macro shooting  
> without parallax error.
> 5) Not a big deal for me, I just have a couple of spares in my bag.
> 6) The norm? Since when? 12 or 18 is more than enough.
> 7) More yawn.
> 8) YES! A usable ISO 6400 would be great. Surely Leica can do as  
> well as my Pentax K5?!
> 9) Sure, why not. Will make the second-hand M9 I plan to buy once  
> the M10 is released and the "must-have-the-latest" crowd are  
> upgrading in volume, cheaper.
> 10) No.
>
> Cheers,
> Nathan
>
> Nathan Wajsman
> Alicante, Spain
> http://www.frozenlight.eu
> http://www.greatpix.eu
> http://www.nathanfoto.com
> PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
> Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/
>
>
> YNWA
>
>
>
> On Feb 7, 2012, at 7:36 PM, mehrdad wrote:
>
>> it seems that the new m digital is around the corner (sep/oct),  
>> what shall
>> we expect after three years and 8k price?
>>
>>
>> i for one do need the following
>>
>>
>> 1) image stabilization built in to the body (they can licsnce this
>> technology  from sony, thier old partner)
>> 2) much better buffer and more frames per second
>> 3) shooting movies with m (not for me)
>> 4) fuji x10/pro like view finder
>> 5) better battery life and better battery
>> 6) 36 meg is now the norm, so something close
>> 7) a built in 1.4x magnifier, that u can use at will
>> 8) all the given dynamic range and high iso performance (it is now  
>> three
>> yrs later)
>> 9) a better price but i think is is truly a dream
>> 10) do we care about live view?
>> -- 
>> -------------------------------------
>> regards, mehrdad
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


Replies: Reply from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] leica m10)
Reply from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] leica m10)
In reply to: Message from msadat at gmail.com (mehrdad) ([Leica] leica m10)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] leica m10)