Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/02/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]OK, it is a big file, I grant you...but is it better than what an M9 would produce? I don't think so. When I compare my M8 images with my friend's full-frame Canon, the M8 is superior in every respect. It's not all about size ;-)) Cheers, Nathan Nathan Wajsman Alicante, Spain http://www.frozenlight.eu http://www.greatpix.eu http://www.nathanfoto.com PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/ YNWA On Feb 7, 2012, at 9:14 PM, philippe.amard wrote: > Nathan look at this one > <http://chsv.nikon-image.com/products/camera/slr/digital/d800/img/sample01/img_07_l.jpg> > > Large ... > > Or where the future lies IMHO > > Amiti?s > Philippe > > > > Le 7 f?vr. 12 ? 21:12, Nathan Wajsman a ?crit : > >> >> OK, I'll bite; >> >> 1) Yawn. My Pentax K5 has it and I never use it. >> 2) I find the buffer on my M8 adequate, so as long as it is not worse, >> then I am fine. >> 3) Double yawn. >> 4) YES. I find the hybrid viewfinder on my Fuji X100 the most significant >> photo technology innovation of the past several years. The main reason I >> like it is that it allows for macro shooting without parallax error. >> 5) Not a big deal for me, I just have a couple of spares in my bag. >> 6) The norm? Since when? 12 or 18 is more than enough. >> 7) More yawn. >> 8) YES! A usable ISO 6400 would be great. Surely Leica can do as well as >> my Pentax K5?! >> 9) Sure, why not. Will make the second-hand M9 I plan to buy once the M10 >> is released and the "must-have-the-latest" crowd are upgrading in volume, >> cheaper. >> 10) No. >> >> Cheers, >> Nathan >> >> Nathan Wajsman >> Alicante, Spain >> http://www.frozenlight.eu >> http://www.greatpix.eu >> http://www.nathanfoto.com >> PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws >> Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/ >> >> >> YNWA >> >> >> >> On Feb 7, 2012, at 7:36 PM, mehrdad wrote: >> >>> it seems that the new m digital is around the corner (sep/oct), what >>> shall >>> we expect after three years and 8k price? >>> >>> >>> i for one do need the following >>> >>> >>> 1) image stabilization built in to the body (they can licsnce this >>> technology from sony, thier old partner) >>> 2) much better buffer and more frames per second >>> 3) shooting movies with m (not for me) >>> 4) fuji x10/pro like view finder >>> 5) better battery life and better battery >>> 6) 36 meg is now the norm, so something close >>> 7) a built in 1.4x magnifier, that u can use at will >>> 8) all the given dynamic range and high iso performance (it is now three >>> yrs later) >>> 9) a better price but i think is is truly a dream >>> 10) do we care about live view? >>> -- >>> ------------------------------------- >>> regards, mehrdad >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Leica Users Group. >>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >