Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/10/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]The reason being the difference between 1600mm and 1700mm in lens is microscopic in effect. But the difference between coverage between 35mm and 6x6 is large. -------------------- Mark William Rabiner Photography http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/ mark at rabinergroup.com > From: Mark William Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> > Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2010 22:30:12 -0400 > To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > Subject: Re: [Leica] One Big Expensive Leica Lens > > Bet you 3 bucks its less. > Rei?!?!?!? > > -------------------- > Mark William Rabiner > Photography > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/ > mark at rabinergroup.com > > >> From: Marty Deveney <benedenia at gmail.com> >> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> >> Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2010 12:34:56 +1030 >> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> >> Subject: Re: [Leica] One Big Expensive Leica Lens >> >> Yes, it would be more. I have the formulae but don't have the details >> to work it out (you need the film to nodal point distance, among other >> things). >> >> Marty >> >> On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> >> wrote: >>> The magnification at medium format it says is 21 do we know what the >>> magnification is for the Leica for I assume 35mm? I'm going to guess its >>> higher. >>> >>> 1600mm at 35 I'd think would be a higher mag than 1700mm at Brownie film. >>> >>> >>> >>> -------------------- >>> Mark William Rabiner >>> Photography >>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/ >>> mark at rabinergroup.com >>> >>> >>>> From: Marty Deveney <benedenia at gmail.com> >>>> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> >>>> Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2010 12:05:24 +1030 >>>> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> >>>> Subject: Re: [Leica] One Big Expensive Leica Lens >>>> >>>> That's a baby. ?This: >>>> http://www.zeiss.com/c12567a8003b58b9/Contents-Frame/8baac109cb80bddfc12571>>>> e >>>> 10 >>>> 0393a1b >>>> is bigger and, I believe, costs more. ?A one-off made for some very >>>> rich dude. >>>> >>>> Marty >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Leica Users Group. >>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information