Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/10/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Not sure how you interpreted what I wrote. The Leica lens will magnify more. A lot more. Marty On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> wrote: > The reason being the difference between 1600mm and 1700mm in lens is > microscopic in effect. But the difference between coverage between 35mm and > 6x6 is large. > > -------------------- > Mark William Rabiner > Photography > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/ > mark at rabinergroup.com > > >> From: Mark William Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> >> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> >> Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2010 22:30:12 -0400 >> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> >> Subject: Re: [Leica] One Big Expensive Leica Lens >> >> Bet you 3 bucks its less. >> Rei?!?!?!? >> >> -------------------- >> Mark William Rabiner >> Photography >> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/ >> mark at rabinergroup.com >> >> >>> From: Marty Deveney <benedenia at gmail.com> >>> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> >>> Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2010 12:34:56 +1030 >>> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> >>> Subject: Re: [Leica] One Big Expensive Leica Lens >>> >>> Yes, it would be more. ?I have the formulae but don't have the details >>> to work it out (you need the film to nodal point distance, among other >>> things). >>> >>> Marty >>> >>> On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> >>> wrote: >>>> The magnification at medium format it says is 21 do we know what the >>>> magnification is for the Leica for I assume 35mm? I'm going to guess its >>>> higher. >>>> >>>> 1600mm at 35 I'd think would be a higher mag than 1700mm at Brownie >>>> film. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -------------------- >>>> Mark William Rabiner >>>> Photography >>>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/ >>>> mark at rabinergroup.com >>>> >>>> >>>>> From: Marty Deveney <benedenia at gmail.com> >>>>> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> >>>>> Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2010 12:05:24 +1030 >>>>> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> >>>>> Subject: Re: [Leica] One Big Expensive Leica Lens >>>>> >>>>> That's a baby. ?This: >>>>> > http://www.zeiss.com/c12567a8003b58b9/Contents-Frame/8baac109cb80bddfc12571>>>> > e >>>>> 10 >>>>> 0393a1b >>>>> is bigger and, I believe, costs more. ?A one-off made for some very >>>>> rich dude. >>>>> >>>>> Marty >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Leica Users Group. >>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Leica Users Group. >>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >