Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/03/30
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 10:28 PM, Vince Passaro <passaro.vince at gmail.com>wrote: > There is -- I've picked up somewhere -- allegedly a downside to having the > image stablization in the camera, on all the time, whatever. What can the > downside be? Like why doe sit have an on/off switch on my panasonic 14-=45 > lens? > If you put the camera on a tripod you should turn off the image stabilization. It will screw the shot up. > > On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 11:22 PM, Sonny Carter <sonc.hegr at gmail.com> > wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 10:07 PM, A. Lal <alal at poly.edu> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Lastly, given the software correction built ino digital cameras how > well > > do > > > Panasonic lenses (e.g. the 20/1.7 pancake) work on Olympus bodies > > > > > > > The Panasonic 20 works great on the Oly EP1, and I've been pretty happy > > with > > having the anti-shake in the camera when I put my Leica glass on the > camera > > with adapters. > > > > > > > > -- > > Regards, > > > > Sonny > > http://www.sonc.com > > http://sonc.stumbleupon.com/ > > Natchitoches, Louisiana > > > > USA > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Leica Users Group. > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > -- Regards, Sonny http://www.sonc.com http://sonc.stumbleupon.com/ Natchitoches, Louisiana USA