Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/03/30

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Comments on GF-1
From: drodgers at casefarms.com (David Rodgers)
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 16:25:25 -0400

Nathan,

While both the GF-1 vs the CL feel similar, I noticed that the former
has some shutter lag. That seems to be the case with many digital
cameras. There may be a way to speed up the shutter response on the
GF-1. I don't know since it's still pretty new to me.  Maybe it won't be
as long when using Leica lenses. I guess it depends on how much of the
delay is due to AF. 

Dave R

-----Original Message-----
From: lug-bounces+drodgers=casefarms.com at leica-users.org
[mailto:lug-bounces+drodgers=casefarms.com at leica-users.org] On Behalf Of
Nathan Wajsman
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 3:37 PM
To: Leica Users Group
Subject: Re: [Leica] Comments on GF-1

I find 800 perfectly OK on mine most of the time. The "digital CL" is
the perfect description of the GF-1 with the 1.7/20mm.

Cheers,
Nathan

Nathan Wajsman
Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu
http://www.greatpix.eu
http://www.nathanfoto.com

Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog





Replies: Reply from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Comments on GF-1)
Reply from passaro.vince at gmail.com (Vince Passaro) ([Leica] Comments on GF-1)
In reply to: Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Comments on GF-1)