Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/03/30
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]With the 20mm, my percentage of missed shots is comparable with the M8, i.e. very low. Cheers, Nathan Nathan Wajsman Alicante, Spain http://www.frozenlight.eu http://www.greatpix.eu http://www.nathanfoto.com Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0 PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog On Mar 30, 2010, at 10:25 PM, David Rodgers wrote: > Nathan, > > While both the GF-1 vs the CL feel similar, I noticed that the former > has some shutter lag. That seems to be the case with many digital > cameras. There may be a way to speed up the shutter response on the > GF-1. I don't know since it's still pretty new to me. Maybe it won't be > as long when using Leica lenses. I guess it depends on how much of the > delay is due to AF. > > Dave R > > -----Original Message----- > From: lug-bounces+drodgers=casefarms.com at leica-users.org > [mailto:lug-bounces+drodgers=casefarms.com at leica-users.org] On Behalf Of > Nathan Wajsman > Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 3:37 PM > To: Leica Users Group > Subject: Re: [Leica] Comments on GF-1 > > I find 800 perfectly OK on mine most of the time. The "digital CL" is > the perfect description of the GF-1 with the 1.7/20mm. > > Cheers, > Nathan > > Nathan Wajsman > Alicante, Spain > http://www.frozenlight.eu > http://www.greatpix.eu > http://www.nathanfoto.com > > Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0 > PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws > Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >