Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2010/01/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] C/V 50/1.1 comment. NOW 35/1.2 also.
From: richard.lists at gmail.com (Richard Man)
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 12:51:41 -0800
References: <mailman.277.1263276672.73134.lug@leica-users.org> <4B4CA188.9050701@verizon.net> <656DDC9C-2082-464B-8324-E19290A72B69@embarqmail.com> <B3926580-B589-42B1-AF1F-4E26B784EF85@frozenlight.eu> <cee56221001120952p4e6fc052q343a7fe0c2667f74@mail.gmail.com> <a3f189161001121229w60f8ec9sfef8b504e7fb75c4@mail.gmail.com> <F715EA80-8F7B-4236-989E-160E73B9B5C6@frozenlight.eu>
I would jump on this lens except that I have my trusty 35/1.4 ASPH.
Hard to justify another 35mm after that....
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 12:31 PM, Nathan Wajsman <photo at frozenlight.eu>
wrote:
> Point proven. Again.
>
--
// richard m: richard @imagecraft.com
// w: http://www.imagecraft.com/pub/Portfolio09/ blog:
http://rfman.wordpress.com
// book: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/detail/745963
Replies:
Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] New 35mm cropped)
In reply to:
Message from s.yoder at verizon.net (Stan Yoder) ([Leica] C/V 50/1.1 comment. NOW 35/1.2 also.)
Message from ricc at embarqmail.com (Ric Carter) ([Leica] C/V 50/1.1 comment. NOW 35/1.2 also.)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] C/V 50/1.1 comment. NOW 35/1.2 also.)
Message from michiel.fokkema at gmail.com (Michiel Fokkema) ([Leica] C/V 50/1.1 comment. NOW 35/1.2 also.)
Message from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] C/V 50/1.1 comment. NOW 35/1.2 also.)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] C/V 50/1.1 comment. NOW 35/1.2 also.)