Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/01/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] C/V 50/1.1 comment. NOW 35/1.2 also.
From: s.yoder at verizon.net (Stan Yoder)
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 11:21:28 -0500
References: <mailman.277.1263276672.73134.lug@leica-users.org>

Good to hear the positive comments about both lenses. Erwin Puts is 
pretty negative about the 35/1.2: very low contrast/micro-contrast at 
larger apertures, lotsa aberrations, soft edges, fringing, etc., etc. He 
does note low vignetting and flare.

This is probably a good example of theoretical vs. experiential judgments.

Stan Yoder


Replies: Reply from mark at whitedogs.co.uk (Mark Pope) ([Leica] C/V 50/1.1 comment - some more example pictures)
Reply from ricc at embarqmail.com (Ric Carter) ([Leica] C/V 50/1.1 comment. NOW 35/1.2 also.)
Reply from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] C/V 50/1.1 comment. NOW 35/1.2 also.)