Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/01/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] C/V 50/1.1 comment - some more example pictures
From: mark at whitedogs.co.uk (Mark Pope)
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 18:12:58 +0000
References: <mailman.277.1263276672.73134.lug@leica-users.org> <4B4CA188.9050701@verizon.net>

Stan,

if you're interested, I posted some other Nokton shots on my website. 
It's a small Lightroom gallery which can be viewed at 
http://www.monomagic.co.uk/nokton

All but one of them is taken wide open on an M8 - shooting 1t 1/6000 or 
1/8000 at ISO 160 was a novel experience - no risk of camera shake!

Hope you fnd them useful.

Cheers


Mark



Mark Pope,
Swindon, Wilts
UK

Homepage               http://www.monomagic.co.uk
Blog                   http://www.monomagic.co.uk/blog
Picture a week (2009)  http://www.monomagic.co.uk/index.php?gallery=paw/2009
                (2008) 
http://www.monomagic.co.uk/index.php?gallery=paw/2008


Stan Yoder wrote:
> Good to hear the positive comments about both lenses. Erwin Puts is 
> pretty negative about the 35/1.2: very low contrast/micro-contrast at 
> larger apertures, lotsa aberrations, soft edges, fringing, etc., etc. He 
> does note low vignetting and flare.
> 
> This is probably a good example of theoretical vs. experiential judgments.
> 
> Stan Yoder
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


In reply to: Message from s.yoder at verizon.net (Stan Yoder) ([Leica] C/V 50/1.1 comment. NOW 35/1.2 also.)