Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/01/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Stan, if you're interested, I posted some other Nokton shots on my website. It's a small Lightroom gallery which can be viewed at http://www.monomagic.co.uk/nokton All but one of them is taken wide open on an M8 - shooting 1t 1/6000 or 1/8000 at ISO 160 was a novel experience - no risk of camera shake! Hope you fnd them useful. Cheers Mark Mark Pope, Swindon, Wilts UK Homepage http://www.monomagic.co.uk Blog http://www.monomagic.co.uk/blog Picture a week (2009) http://www.monomagic.co.uk/index.php?gallery=paw/2009 (2008) http://www.monomagic.co.uk/index.php?gallery=paw/2008 Stan Yoder wrote: > Good to hear the positive comments about both lenses. Erwin Puts is > pretty negative about the 35/1.2: very low contrast/micro-contrast at > larger apertures, lotsa aberrations, soft edges, fringing, etc., etc. He > does note low vignetting and flare. > > This is probably a good example of theoretical vs. experiential judgments. > > Stan Yoder > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information