Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/01/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Stan,
if you're interested, I posted some other Nokton shots on my website.
It's a small Lightroom gallery which can be viewed at
http://www.monomagic.co.uk/nokton
All but one of them is taken wide open on an M8 - shooting 1t 1/6000 or
1/8000 at ISO 160 was a novel experience - no risk of camera shake!
Hope you fnd them useful.
Cheers
Mark
Mark Pope,
Swindon, Wilts
UK
Homepage http://www.monomagic.co.uk
Blog http://www.monomagic.co.uk/blog
Picture a week (2009) http://www.monomagic.co.uk/index.php?gallery=paw/2009
(2008)
http://www.monomagic.co.uk/index.php?gallery=paw/2008
Stan Yoder wrote:
> Good to hear the positive comments about both lenses. Erwin Puts is
> pretty negative about the 35/1.2: very low contrast/micro-contrast at
> larger apertures, lotsa aberrations, soft edges, fringing, etc., etc. He
> does note low vignetting and flare.
>
> This is probably a good example of theoretical vs. experiential judgments.
>
> Stan Yoder
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information