Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/01/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] C/V 50/1.1 comment. NOW 35/1.2 also.
From: photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman)
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 18:23:54 +0100
References: <mailman.277.1263276672.73134.lug@leica-users.org> <4B4CA188.9050701@verizon.net> <656DDC9C-2082-464B-8324-E19290A72B69@embarqmail.com>

And so is Nathan...

Nathan Wajsman
Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu
http://www.greatpix.eu
http://www.nathanfoto.com

Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog



On Jan 12, 2010, at 5:52 PM, Ric Carter wrote:

> Ric Carter is pretty positive about the 35/1.2
> 
> ric
> 
> 
> On Jan 12, 2010, at 11:21 AM, Stan Yoder wrote:
> 
>> Erwin Puts is pretty negative about the 35/1.2
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 



Replies: Reply from michiel.fokkema at gmail.com (Michiel Fokkema) ([Leica] C/V 50/1.1 comment. NOW 35/1.2 also.)
In reply to: Message from s.yoder at verizon.net (Stan Yoder) ([Leica] C/V 50/1.1 comment. NOW 35/1.2 also.)
Message from ricc at embarqmail.com (Ric Carter) ([Leica] C/V 50/1.1 comment. NOW 35/1.2 also.)