Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/01/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] GF-1 v. EP-2
From: photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman)
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 20:02:22 +0100
References: <f2f825f21001120924p6c9133a4p9253a11331ef87a2@mail.gmail.com> <3E80CCA4-3088-4E66-9DBD-F92673D09DF7@btinternet.com>

I have an E3, and frankly I too think that IS is overrated. Perhaps because 
given what I like to photograph, subject movement is likely to be just as 
much of an issue as camera shake.

I have never tried the EP-2 but I am very pleased with the GF-1. I can't 
wait to try Leica lenses on it.

Cheers,
Nathan

Nathan Wajsman
Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu
http://www.greatpix.eu
http://www.nathanfoto.com

Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog



On Jan 12, 2010, at 6:45 PM, Frank Dernie wrote:

> I can not speak for the EP 2 but I have tried the E3 with a panaleica 
> 14-150 lens, which is excellent BTW, which has stabilisation. The manuals 
> strongly advise against leaving both stabilisations on together, it does 
> not work. I preferred body stabilisation off, lens on in this combination.
> The EP1 I tried had pitifully slow AF compared to the Panasonic G1, so I 
> bet the GF1 will be better than the EP2.
> I actually think IS is over-rated. It does not compensate for rotary shake 
> very well, if at all, so in general I think it is a snapshot or get you 
> out the sh*t solution. The E3 was very poor with long lenses and IS on, 
> -very- few keepers. The E3 and normal lenses are not really much smaller 
> than 35mm stuff, the teles are much smaller so I thought it would be a 
> great camera for nature pix when walking my dogs but I got very few sharp 
> shots, either AF or IS not working well :-( Better with MF and no IS.
> Not worth carrying at all.
> cheers,
> Frank
> 
> On 12 Jan, 2010, at 17:24, Roger Rubin wrote:
> 
>> Hi all:
>> Has anyone compared the GF-1 with the EP-2?? The latter has the
>> stabilization in the body. At last nites' LUG meeting in NY we were
>> wondering- what happens if you put a micro 4/3 lens with stabilization on 
>> a
>> body with stabilization? Do you get double stabilization?? I  have heard
>> that the EP-2 finder is better than that of the GF-1. Any comparisons??
>> vroger
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 



In reply to: Message from vroger at gmail.com (Roger Rubin) ([Leica] GF-1 v. EP-2)
Message from Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com (Frank Dernie) ([Leica] GF-1 v. EP-2)