Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/11/09

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] m9 review
From: benedenia at gmail.com (Marty Deveney)
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:04:28 +1030
References: <C71D1BB1.58386%mark@rabinergroup.com> <2B32D10C-CE25-485C-8D04-E9EABD6CDEB6@ameritech.net> <36172e5a0911092023s2a2fd6b0lcc7ea8d51a8bd6c@mail.gmail.com> <a3f189160911092032x93967aao88c9e67eabb6d901@mail.gmail.com>

I think Geoff is suggesting Dante is having a bad day.  I'd suggest
Dante is actually seeing very lucidly.

Marty

On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 3:02 PM, Sonny Carter <sonc.hegr at gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't get this, Geoff.
>
> On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 10:23 PM, Geoff Hopkinson <hopsternew at 
> gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Dante, when you started your day, you lost your car keys, someone stole
>> your
>> parking space, the cafe was out of your favourite muffins, your coffee had
>> a
>> fly in it and your pet hamster has leprosy and an unplanned pregnancy or
>> something??? ;-) ;-)
>> Sheesh!
>>
>>
>> 2009/11/10 Dante Stella <dstella1 at ameritech.net>
>>
>> > Mark, this is not about raw speed - though I know that makes for a 
>> > better
>> > straw-man.
>> >
>> > 1. ? ? ?David Keenan is dead-on correct about the M8/M9 architecture,
>> which
>> > has a long shutter lag (six times that of an M3 and double that of a 
>> > D3),
>> is
>> > slow to a second shot (should/when you need one), and can lock up fairly
>> > easily taking repeated shots, even without mashing down the shutter
>> button
>> > on continuous. ?I have years of experience with this on the M8 and agree
>> > with Keenan that unresponsiveness - particularly on a first shot - is
>> > inexcusable. ?This is even more the case where a camera allegedly is
>> > designed to capture some "decisive moment."
>> >
>> > 2. ? ? ?Two things that didn't get mentioned (and hopefully these have
>> not
>> > carried on to the M9) are (a) the tendency of the M8 to wildly 
>> > overexpose
>> if
>> > the shutter is pressed too quickly when the meter is "waking up" -
>> > apparently a bad habit carried over with the M7 meter - and (b) the
>> tendency
>> > not to fire the flash at all if the shutter is tripped too quickly after
>> the
>> > shutter is first pressed. ?Then go to #1 above for the slow recovery 
>> > from
>> > the resulting missed shot.
>> >
>> > If the M9 is in any way worse than an M8 in responsiveness, it's a fail.
>> ?I
>> > don't believe that a camera should have any ability to second-guess, ask
>> for
>> > a "do-over," or be asleep on the job when I need it.
>> >
>> > The decision when and if to take a picture is not an exercise for a
>> > committee.
>> >
>> > Unless that committee is a committee of one.
>> >
>> > Me.
>> >
>> > Dante
>> >
>> > ____________
>> > Dante Stella
>> > http://www.dantestella.com
>> >
>> > NO ARCHIVE
>> >
>> > On Nov 9, 2009, at 1:06 AM, Mark Rabiner wrote:
>> >
>> > We'll see if anyone else in the world especially a reviewer especially a
>> >> real reviewer thinks there's ?a speed issue with the camera. As in the
>> >> camrea shoots too slow. Which he goes on and on about.
>> >>
>> >> I wasn't too offended till I got half way down the page and hit the
>> >> " The Major Flaw of the M9"
>> >>
>> >> He's holding the shutter button down until the thing slow up and stops
>> >> shooting at 2 frames per second and that takes ?seven or eight
>> exposures.
>> >> " Inexcusable" he says
>> >> !?!?!
>> >>
>> >> And he insists on shooting "compressed RAW + fine JPG" .
>> >> Gotta have both.
>> >> It's gotta be compressed
>> >> And he's gotta go on and on about it.
>> >>
>> >> The last time I held the shutter button down like that on even a DSLR
>> was
>> >> never.
>> >> And I've shot skate boarders.
>> >>
>> >> But not Golf swing studies.
>> >>
>> >> There's a difference between camera ?bloggers and ?cameras reviewers.
>> >> And I'd think the digitaljournalist people would know that.
>> >> .
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Mark William Rabiner
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Leica Users Group.
>> >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Leica Users Group.
>> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Cheers
>> Geoff
>> The new LEICA M9
>> Passion for perfect pictures.
>> http://www.m.leica-camera.com
>>
>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/gh/
>> http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Sonny
> http://www.sonc.com
> http://sonc.stumbleupon.com/
> Natchitoches, Louisiana
> (+31.754164,-093.099080)
>
> USA
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


Replies: Reply from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] m9 review)
In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] m9 review)
Message from dstella1 at ameritech.net (Dante Stella) ([Leica] m9 review)
Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] m9 review)
Message from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] m9 review)