Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/10/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Stock Photography
From: chs2018 at med.cornell.edu (Chris Saganich)
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 15:26:06 -0400
References: <4ADF0E4A.2010400@comporium.net> <5464C8B2604245D7B2C28B330C67185E@syneticfeba505> <4ADF4769.9090202@comcast.net> <6.2.5.6.2.20091021150415.02c252e8@med.cornell.edu> <EFA4092628474E8FB4B4897BAD55C99C@syneticfeba505> <6.2.5.6.2.20091022123115.02e72c28@med.cornell.edu> <62A66F21C2D6404498D5E14EAAF65343@syneticfeba505>

The contempt is aimed at the industry.  I suppose there aren't too 
many LUGGERS photographing children eating happy meals for 
bilboards.  For those who are, please stop.


At 02:05 PM 10/22/2009, you wrote:
>Gee Chris, YOU NEVER MENTIONED TV ADVERTISING very 3 minutes or so?
>
>Is it we the photographers who tick you off or is it the constant 
>bombardment by TV commercials that make you so angry?
>ted
>----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Saganich" <chs2018 at 
>med.cornell.edu>
>To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
>Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2009 10:17 AM
>Subject: Re: [Leica] Stock Photography
>
>
>>And if anyone wishes to save photography from oblivion there needs to
>>be a serious critical perception shift away from the devaluation of
>>imagery which is promoted through editorial and advertising.  This
>>can start by critically thinking about the role of imagery in
>>non-ethical advertising practices.  I consider all advertising
>>non-ethical but that is just my somewhat radical (but justified)
>>view.  Yes. I'm likely to deface a billboard rather then chain myself
>>to an old oak tree...so laugh if you like I find advertising an
>>initial condition for much of the modern ill's we face, from economy
>>to obesity, because it creates and manipulates all our cues.  Cues,
>>or another way to look at it is our salient attention, what we pay
>>attention to.  Images are used predominantly to create and reinforce
>>our cues.  As Tina's images cue people to care or give money on the
>>positive side, similar images could be used to cue people to despise
>>and vilify the same people.  When I walk around I see images that are
>>predominantly used in ways to cue people into unhealthy socially and
>>civilly degrading behavior and thinking.  I don't see a cell phone
>>advertisement, I see the promotion of a product that will very likely
>>have profound health effects on its heaviest users 20 years from
>>now.  When I see a child enjoying a Happy Meal I don't see a happy
>>kid, I see 100 million 25 year olds with a health profile that makes
>>most doctors shudder and the collapse of our health care
>>system.  Call it a crusade I suppose but I HATE ADVERTISING and
>>images are it's core component.   So it turns my stomach to see
>>photography and images used like that to cue people into all these
>>unhealthy, negative behaviors just for the profit.  Profit over
>>people is mostly how I see images being used.  It's just a
>>living?...a living breathing, breeding, disaster in my opinion.
>>
>>
>>At 06:11 PM 10/21/2009, you wrote:
>>>From: "Chris Saganich" <chs2018 at med.cornell.edu>
>>>To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
>>>Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 12:50 PM
>>>Subject: Re: [Leica] Stock Photography
>>>
>>>
>>>>Advertising IS maleficence in action.  Editorial is not so much
>>>>better in my book, just promoting the rational.  It's easy to
>>>>rationalize "making a living" doing just about anything.  Too bad
>>>>that seems to be where the argument ends, that making a living
>>>>justifies ignoring the ethical comportment of the industries we work
>>>>in.  I can only wish I could choose which images could be stripped
>>>>naked, exploited, and discarded and which ones could not.    The very
>>>>idea of purposely making an image for that destiny turns my
>>>>stomach.  Like a rack of ribs to a Buddhist.
>>>
>>>Gee Chris I sure wish I understood what you mean ? Maybe I could be
>>>of help to clear this up in your description. Maybe?
>>>Dr. ted
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Leica Users Group.
>>>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Leica Users Group.
>>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>Version: 8.5.423 / Virus Database: 270.14.26/2451 - Release Date: 
>10/22/09 08:51:00
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Stock Photography)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (tedgrant at shaw.ca) ([Leica] Stock Photography)
Message from charcot at comcast.net (charcot) ([Leica] Stock Photography)
Message from chs2018 at med.cornell.edu (Chris Saganich) ([Leica] Stock Photography)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (tedgrant at shaw.ca) ([Leica] Stock Photography)
Message from chs2018 at med.cornell.edu (Chris Saganich) ([Leica] Stock Photography)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (tedgrant at shaw.ca) ([Leica] Stock Photography)