Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/10/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] iso 100.000+??
From: jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj)
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 21:39:15 +0530
References: <380-220091042215517841@M2W007.mail2web.com>

Well, you have to live with inferior low light performance in that
case. I think that the Nikon 200-400 is no slouch though, and at the
normal print sizes that you have for sale nobody would be able to tell
the difference from your 280 APO-Telyt.
Cheers
Jayanand

On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 8:35 PM, wildlightphoto at earthlink.net
<wildlightphoto at earthlink.net> wrote:
> Jayanand Govindaraj wrote:
>
>>>>
> Doug,
> You should have shifted to a Nikon D3 long ago - its perfect for what you
> do.
> Cheers
> Jayanand
> <<<
>
> It's not 16-bit, the APO-Telyt would have to be used full manualy, I don't
> like Nikon USA's warranty policy or the proprietary RAW file format, and
> the viewfinder isn't optimized for manual focus. ?If the DMR dies and can't
> be ressurrected it's an option but it's not my first choice.
>
> Doug Herr
> Birdman of Sacramento
> http://www.wildlightphoto.com
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> mail2web - Check your email from the web at
> http://link.mail2web.com/mail2web
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


In reply to: Message from wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (wildlightphoto at earthlink.net) ([Leica] iso 100.000+??)