Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/10/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Doug, You should have shifted to a Nikon D3 long ago - its perfect for what you do. Cheers Jayanand On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Doug Herr <wildlightphoto at earthlink.net> wrote: > Steve Barbour wrote: > >>On Oct 21, 2009, at 10:19 PM, grduprey at mchsi.com wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> Why do we need iso 100,000? ?I seem to remember we all got along >>> just fine with iso 400 or 800. ?Seems like just a race to see who >>> can supply the highest iso before the next guy. >> >> >>good question... >> >>I used to shoot in almost total darkness with asa 400 on film at ?f1, >>a ?Noctilux, that was usually fine... >> >>now we have fast lenses with ISO ? 400-800, even 1200... >> >> >>what am I missing? >> > > I'd love to get the same image quality I'm presently getting with the DMR > but at a faster ISO. ?I lost numerous photos last weekend to subject > motion. > > Doug Herr > Birdman of Sacramento > http://www.wildlightphoto.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >