Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/10/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]That is only your opinion. I respect it. But I find it is interesting that you comment on lenses other than the one I had mentioned, but that is typical when people would like to justify a point of view a any cost. Cheers Jayanand On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 10:01 PM, wildlightphoto at earthlink.net <wildlightphoto at earthlink.net> wrote: > Jayanand Govindaraj wrote: > >>>> > Well, you have to live with inferior low light performance in that > case. I think that the Nikon 200-400 is no slouch though, and at the > normal print sizes that you have for sale nobody would be able to tell > the difference from your 280 APO-Telyt. > <<< > > Since the first person I have to satisfy is myself, high-ISO performance > only interests me if it comes with DMR image quality. ?Comparing the 280mm > f/4 APO-Telyt's performance with the AF 300mm f/4 ED-IF I bought for my > brother or the pre-IF 300mm f/4.5 ED I still have and which Bj?rn R?rslett > rates so highly, sorry to be so blunt but neither of these Nikkors measures > up to the APO-Telyt, optically, mechanically or ergonomically. ?Not even > close. > > Doug Herr > Birdman of Sacramento > http://www.willdightphoto.com > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > myhosting.com - Premium Microsoft? Windows? and Linux web and application > hosting - http://link.myhosting.com/myhosting > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >